22 Comments Already

rigman Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:45 am  

some pro McCanns have said that how could a mother kill her child?
Well !!! This is an piece taken from an article by a journalist Lisa Lascody called When Moms Attack.

I was shocked and horrified while watching the news coverage recently about the woman in Texas who beat her children to death with rocks. This is not the first time I have heard about a mother killing her kids, in fact, there seems to quite a few of these cases in the news lately. I remember the high profile cases of Susan Smith and Andrea Yates as well as a few others that did not garner as much media attention.

While doing some research for this article, there was another horrible child murder. A young couple in Texas strangled and then decapitated their three young children. I began to wonder how many killer moms were out there. So, after a bit of online research and remedial statistical analysis, I found the surprising answer.

It is called "maternal filicide" which is a fancy way of saying child murderer and it happens over 600 times each year. That number seemed ridiculously high to me so I doubled checked with the Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics and the FBI Crime statistics. They verified that mothers kill their own kids over 600 times per year!

That puts a pretty frightening face on the group calling itself the "Million Mom March". I wonder how many of those mothers are ticking time bombs? What sets them off and how can we protect their children? I know of at least one of those anti-gun moms who committed murder. She even spoke out against gun violence at the first Million Mom March in Washington, D.C. Then, a few months later, she shot and killed a boy. Now, she didn’t kill her own child, but she did murder the boy she thought had shot her son. It turned out she got the wrong guy and shot an innocent person. What that group needed to be pushing was self control not gun control. Perhaps, after reading the rest of this article, they will see the dangers within their own group and switch their efforts to mother control.

Gun control groups love to use the phony statistic of "13 kids per day die from firearms each year". Most of you reading this article know that number includes suicides, accidents and homicides. It also includes children up to 19 years old as well as crime-related deaths. So, if a police officer shoots and kills a 17-year-old armed robber that is counted as one of the "13 kids per day".

I decided to do a little comparison between the number of kids killed by their mothers and the number of children killed with a firearm. I only used kids under the age of 5 for this comparison because they had their own special statistical category called infanticide. Plus, not too many kids under 5 are in gangs or committing suicide so the results would not be skewed.

Children under the age of 5 in the United States are more likely to be killed by their parents than by anyone else. FBI crime stats show that in 1999 parents were responsible for 57% of these murders. Even though women commit less than 13% of all violent crime, they are responsible for about 50% of all parental murders.

These killer moms almost never use a gun to kill their kids. They prefer a more hands-on approach like beating, drowning, shaking, strangling or suffocation. Others will resort to poisoning, stabbing or exposure to the elements. Less than 20% of the cases involved a parent shooting their child to death. (US Dept. of Justice Study, 1988)

In 1999, there were 613 homicides of children under the age of 5. Of these homicides, only 73 were killed with a firearm while 351were killed by a parent! Of the 73 children killed with a firearm, about 20% of those were committed by one of the parents. So, that brings down the number down from 73 to 59. (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1999) That is 351 cases of parents murdering their kids compared to 59 firearm-related homicides in one year. To be fair, I have been mainly discussing mothers. Since around half of all the parental murderers are mothers, that number is about 175. Still, those numbers are staggering.

The numbers seem to indicate that kids have much more to fear from their own mothers than from most gun owners. In fact, legal gun owners are only responsible for less than one percent of all crimes.

I am not anti-mother and I don’t want to ban motherhood, but I do support reasonable mom-control laws like background checks, licensing & registration, waiting periods and a limit on the number of children one mother can raise. After all, isn’t it worth it if it saves just one child?

Dominic J Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:47 am  

I stopped caring.
References :

ffordcash Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:49 am  

Poor comparison
no guns involved.
She was taken,,,,,,,,,,
References :

Mr Sceptic Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:51 am  

Well that proves it. Let’s hang her now.

P.S. This is irony.
References :

MUSH Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:53 am  

Its happened too many times not be considered a possibility
References :

Storm Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:55 am  

I have worked with mums that have killed their babies, and without going into detail, I realised that a mum thinks no one can look after their child as well as them.
I am talking extreme circumstances like being diagnosed with a terminal illness.
References :

susiwak Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:57 am  

ever heard of Post Partum Depression???? VERY BAD AND DANGEROUS AND OHHHH SO UNPREDICTABLE! hOW DOES ANYONE KILL A CHILD, NOT JUST MOTHER’S?? Some women have killed thier children because thier "lover" did not want kids. S-T-U-P-I-D!!! jUST BECAUSE A CHICK CAN GIVE BIRTH DOES NOT MAKE THEM A GOOD PARENT.
References :

steph j Said,
July 9th, 2009 @10:59 am  

cba to read all that but its a well known fact that a very high percentage of parents kill their children. so what?
References :

Be Vamp Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:01 am  

you need to buy tax for your car
you need a licence to drive
you have to be police checked for most jobs inc taxi driver
you need a licence for fishing or shooting

but

anyone can have a child
References :

Oracle Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:03 am  

If that is not horrifying enough – why do the pro McCanns seem so afraid of Maddie being found?

Why are they so bent on keeping the focus on the McCanns and not on finding MADELEINE?

There are some seriously sick people out there!!

Anyone with an ounce of humanity would be concentrating on the need to find MADELEINE not playing stupid and mindless word games!!!
References :

Lil*Miss*Keely Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:05 am  

In a newspaper in the UK today.. and a few days ago..
It has been said the McCann’s names could be cleared by a witness AND the hair in the car was the twins!
I personally think the McCann’s are innocent!
References :

sammy Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:07 am  

wow there I think you need to move to china yes mums do kill but so do dads and just because you know how to use a gun doesn’t mean you will.I think this is far to big brother.
References :

Rosie Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:09 am  

There have been many horrible stories of mothers killing their children, some extremely sadistically. It has been going on for years and is still 70% a factor in the killing of young children. Of course the McCanns would come under suspicion, on statistical grounds if nothing else. For all those who keep saying ‘I can’t believe a mother coule kill her child’ I suggest they start reading the papers. It happens all the time.
I am not saying Mrs McCann is guilty but I am saying that it has to be a possibility.
References :

andrew642593 Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:11 am  

Well the McCanns are in the clear, and that suits me.Child neglect, yes, but manslaughter NO.
References :

bumpbump Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:13 am  

The McCanns are totally innocent. Your talk is all FLUFF.
References :

ronaldo Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:15 am  

BORING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
References :

snaffle Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:17 am  

I don’t get the ‘how could a mum murder her child’ argument – it happens so often. Also abuse in the home is put down to fathers but is more often mothers. Throw in a bit of munchausen’s by proxy and you’re lucky to get past pre-school! People get so angry at the accusation because it ruins their cosy view of the world – if you remember the amazing strength of feeling with James Bulger aimed at the 10 year old children who killed him, people found it so abhorent that a child could do that, said they must be evil. People don’t deal well with having their view of the world challenged.

If you really want to depress yourself read the filicide entry on Wiki.
References :

kooki Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:19 am  

I am a mother of two gorgeus boys. I would die myself before harming them. I agree with you a licence should be necessary to have a child(although i don’t believe that will ever happen) Too many parents have babies for the wrong reasons, too save a relationship, more money, I don’t know.

I only can tell you why I have my boys, I craved having children from about 13 or 14 yrs old, I knew I wanted to be a mum more than anything in the world, I came from a good loving catholic home, my parents were always there for me and my brothers, So I didn’t have them to fill a void or anything like that.

My first child was an angel, He slept through the night he hardly cried he was great I could not of asked for more.

My second son, however, was completely different, he didn’t sleep didn’t eat cried all the time, It was awful I loved him, I did however suffer what I would call a mild case of post natal depression, I think it was mainly down to sleep deprivation, but I could relate to mothers who shake their babies hurt their babies, it was the scariest time of my life, but I was one of the lucky ones, I have an amazing Mother who was at the end of the phone I would call her at all times of the night and she would come round she saved me is the truth of it I don’t know, I don’t want to know. what would have happened if she hadn’t been there (my husband worked nights just incase you were wondering) I honestly don’t think my son would be here today if hadn’t been for my Mother , God Bless my Mother.

I think that if these parents who do this to there children had support like I had maybe it wouldn’t happen, I’m not saying it would stop completely some peopl are just born evil. But maybe just maybe it might help them.

But I know I could never hurt my babies they’re both good strong happy healthy lads and I thank God every day for them, this is my path in life.
References :
Mother of two boys 7 and 3

sparklyarhse Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:21 am  

WOW!

What?
References :

?MrsTlJones? Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:23 am  

i think this subject getting a bit boring now!
References :

Sally Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:25 am  

I think when the Pro-McCanns say a mother couldn’t kill her child, what they really mean, (whether they know it or not,) is that they don’t think an educated, pretty, middle class mother could do it.
I am a 20 year old single mother to a lovely 2 1/2 year old boy. I would never, ever leave him alone while I went out. But had this been me on holiday, or anyone like me, I very much doubt there would have been this huge, sickening display of ‘sympathy’ and donations.
Any mother could kill her child. Some are just better at covering it up.
References :

christine m Said,
July 9th, 2009 @11:27 am  

as you have pointed out, any mother could kill her child, sad fact of life for those poor defenceless children.

As bad as it is i think the larger the country the higher proportion it seems to be. Not sure how that equates with England being a smaller country than the US, with the statistics.
References :

Related Post

Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments will be hand modified by our authors so any over offensive comments will be removed and your submitted comments will be appreared after approved

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree Plugin

Security Code:

N/A

  • Lucky Me in The Old and the New Swiss Army Knif…
  • devin b in The Old and the New Swiss Army Knif…
  • morgan in The Old and the New Swiss Army Knif…
  • Metroguy in The Old and the New Swiss Army Knif…
  • aussieguyliam in The Old and the New Swiss Army Knif…
  • da1nonly in This should have been a fox!
  • ????™ in This should have been a fox!
  • Stupid Genius in This should have been a fox!
  • mandy in This should have been a fox!
  • Perri in This should have been a fox!
  • Tenacious 1 1 1 1 1

Take Our Poll

Top Commentators

    • No commentators.

Search

Categories

Meta

Archives

Pages

Links

flickr

who blog this