Popularity: 10% [?]
17 Comments Already
yes. they’re fair game. the first gentleman (or lady) will represent the United States, too.
References :
If they say things like what Osama’s wife said then yes they are fair game.
References :
if they’re a part of the campaign, yes. when howard dean was running for the nomination in ‘04 his wife declined to participate. that’s the way to go, in my opinion.
References :
Just look at Bill/Hillary.
CLEARLY the spouses have a major influence over the behavior (and perhaps a glimpse to the real personality) of the candidate. WHY NOT take them into consideration?
When TERREHHHZA Heinz-Kerry opened her big mouth, we saw how hateful and mean the Kerry family is, so YES… history tells us the spouse is an important consideration.
References :
I do not think they should, but the spouses have come under fire on this board quite a bit. Personally, I think it is a reflection of the posters inability to reasonably explain their objection to a candidates position on something. Easier to spew poison about someones drug use years ago, their age, what thing they said that shuld have been said another way, etc.
References :
NO.
References :
Only when they speak up about political issues the the gloves are off Skippy.
References :
I don’t think they should.
References :
yes they are married to them and choose to go into that lifestyle no one forced them to marry a person who wants to be president.
References :
McCains wife doesn’t go on the trail and say stupid things. Michelle does and she is being held accountable. If we can’t be frank we might as well just put duct tape over our mouth and ears and eyes and blindly vote for Obama.
References :
It could be considered "fair game" if people were able to keep in mind that a spouse isn’t running for office. If I’m capable of having a relationship with someone who doesn’t align perfectly with my own political views, it certainly shouldn’t be considered beyond the pale that Presidential Candidates do it.
The problem, however, is that campaigns are about controling images and how consumers receive the "message." If a spouse were at all connected to the campaign, one would expect them to tow the same line that campaign associates do.
But, then again, campaign associates have had a history of not quite towing the line, either. The whole idea of how these campaigns and the public’s perception of them are shaped is entirely farcical already. The spouse is yet another odd character in the kabuki.
References :
Sure they should. if the spouse opens their mouth to criticize then they are fair game.
References :
NOPE! They are not in the race. The race should be about the issues and between all of the Candidates, not their spouses. This is simply not a cat fight. However, their spouses will frequently be in the limelight. Hopefully, they will not make idiotic, racist, unpatriotic remarks like Michelle Obama has made on several occasions now.
References :
If the spouses jump into the ugly mess we now call politics then yes,they should be considered fair game.If you sling mud you better know how to duck.
References :
Yes
References :
i think so because they are representatives of the American people and should be scrutinized as much as their spouse who is running for president. I personally think Michelle Obama has already stuck her foot in her mouth too many times to be a first lady.
References :
Related Post
- Time for a rethink on bird of prey poisonings? (March 17th, 2010)
- The tale of a Tudor ratter (March 16th, 2010)
- First trout of the season (March 15th, 2010)
- Filming in a pigeon hide (March 13th, 2010)
- Griffiths had ‘poor attitude’ (March 12th, 2010)


Should The Spouses Of The Presidential Candidates Currently, Be Fair Game For Political Attacks?
Hello!
This question was based on the prevalence of back and forth political attacks on Sen. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain, for their spouses’ comments on some political issues.
Your response would be greatly appreciated.
BringBaka.
NYC.